this whole post is dedicated to 'SOB'.
with your countless comments on my tagboard, i am implying by default that you do read my blog constantly. that said, i am indeed flattered.
but seriously dude, why the childish retorts?
i take the jack purcell shoes as the initiation for your anger and the subsequent picture of myself as a baseline for you to take a piss on my pride more with your insult.
i really should screw a big fat signboard into your arsehole that says in bold: TAUFIQ IS MATERIALISTIC.
for starters, jack purcell shoes are cheap alternatives for any dunks/prestos/air-maxs or running shoes. with that in mind, the classic look, the simplicity and the fact that the shoes go with any outfit make jack purcells tempting for anybody. it beats the cheena trend with the normal converse shoes because it's different in design. and mind you, i do have a collection because i've been wearing jack purcells since secondary school.
if you're one of those rocker dudes (i'm vaguely saying 'rockers' because there is a wide range of rock genres) who think that only rockers or only listeners to rock music are allowed to wear jack purcells, then i say FUCK YOU.
jack purcells are tennis shoes and it was made popular by bands of many genres when other sports brands came up and ousted the shoes from the market. you have no right to say that your culture or music owns it. fashion is often associated with the certain type of music and jack purcells are often associated with rock bands. that, i know and your baseless comment that i am a 'poseur' because i wear jack purcells just shows how immature you are.
that's because fashion has no boundaries.
for my case, i go for the common sporty standouts and the classy look when i do feel like dressing. jack purcells make great addition to any tees or pants.
the fact that i am materialistic shows that i buy the pair of shoes (or clothes) not because i want to look like a certain group of people but because of the brand. get this, doofus.
and then comes the picture issue. francesco totti, brad pitt, joshua scott chasez, kevin richardson and brian littrell all have prominent cheek jaws. i'm not saying that mine is prominent but since you said that my cheek jaw is 'like a horse', then i would reckon that mine probably is. if you don't know them, go do your research. good-looking lads, the examples above.
well, as you know, i've got the backings of the people who reads my blog. if you're really tough, if you're a professional critic and if you really have the guts, you can do a proper comment. maybe we'll have a war of words on the taggie for eternity. that, i don't mind.
you're pretty silent today so i take that you are indeed, well, lost for words?
hope to hear from you soon.
but seriously dude, why the childish retorts?
i take the jack purcell shoes as the initiation for your anger and the subsequent picture of myself as a baseline for you to take a piss on my pride more with your insult.
i really should screw a big fat signboard into your arsehole that says in bold: TAUFIQ IS MATERIALISTIC.
for starters, jack purcell shoes are cheap alternatives for any dunks/prestos/air-maxs or running shoes. with that in mind, the classic look, the simplicity and the fact that the shoes go with any outfit make jack purcells tempting for anybody. it beats the cheena trend with the normal converse shoes because it's different in design. and mind you, i do have a collection because i've been wearing jack purcells since secondary school.
if you're one of those rocker dudes (i'm vaguely saying 'rockers' because there is a wide range of rock genres) who think that only rockers or only listeners to rock music are allowed to wear jack purcells, then i say FUCK YOU.
jack purcells are tennis shoes and it was made popular by bands of many genres when other sports brands came up and ousted the shoes from the market. you have no right to say that your culture or music owns it. fashion is often associated with the certain type of music and jack purcells are often associated with rock bands. that, i know and your baseless comment that i am a 'poseur' because i wear jack purcells just shows how immature you are.
that's because fashion has no boundaries.
for my case, i go for the common sporty standouts and the classy look when i do feel like dressing. jack purcells make great addition to any tees or pants.
the fact that i am materialistic shows that i buy the pair of shoes (or clothes) not because i want to look like a certain group of people but because of the brand. get this, doofus.
and then comes the picture issue. francesco totti, brad pitt, joshua scott chasez, kevin richardson and brian littrell all have prominent cheek jaws. i'm not saying that mine is prominent but since you said that my cheek jaw is 'like a horse', then i would reckon that mine probably is. if you don't know them, go do your research. good-looking lads, the examples above.
well, as you know, i've got the backings of the people who reads my blog. if you're really tough, if you're a professional critic and if you really have the guts, you can do a proper comment. maybe we'll have a war of words on the taggie for eternity. that, i don't mind.
you're pretty silent today so i take that you are indeed, well, lost for words?
hope to hear from you soon.
2 Comments:
you've just made 'SOB' feel he's in cloud nine with your posting dedicated to him.
Don't be affected man! It shows the weakling in you.
By
Anonymous, at 9:03 AM
the post was my opinion on the issue. i guess it's better to let the things be ripped out properly.
certainly not a 'weakling' on my part. i was merely standing up for myself.
if you did read the post, it was an entirely civilised rebutt with myself limiting the vulgarities that i could have used.
if SOB wants my piss, then he'll get what i think should be my piss.
and yeah, i don't need the above half-hearted encouragement, you know.
By
Trent Fellah, at 10:34 PM
Post a Comment
<< Home